380 The Faith of Our Fathers after their ordination. It is important also to observe that the unmarried clergy of the East are held in much higher esteem by the people than the married Priests. It cannot, indeed, be denied that at certain epochs of the Church's history, especially in periods of disordered society, there were too many instances of the violation of clerical celibacy. But the repeated violations of a law are no evidence of its nonexistence. Whenever the voice of the Church could be heard it always spoke in vindication of the law of priestly chastity. Let me now call your attention to the propriety and advantages of clerical celibacy. First — The Priest is the representative of Jesus Christ. He continues the work begun by his Divine Master. It is his duty to preach the word, to administer the Sacraments, and, above all, to consecrate the Body and Blood of Christ and to distribute the same to the faithful. Is it not becoming that a chaste Lord should be served by chaste ministers? If the Jewish Priests, while engaged in their turn in offering the sacrifice of animals in the Temple, were obliged to keep apart from their wives, should not the Priests of the New Law, who offer daily the sacrifice of the Immaculate Lamb, practise continual chastity? If David and his friends were not permitted to eat the bread of Proposition till he had avowed that for the three preceding days they had refrained from women,527 how pure in body and soul [403] should be the Priest who daily partakes of that living Bread of which the bread of Proposition was but the type; and if the people at Mount Sinai were forbidden to come near their wives for three days before receiving the Law,528 should not they whose office it is to preach the Law at all times abstain altogether? Thorndyke, an eminent Protestant Divine, in his work entitled, Just Weights and Measures, makes the following observation: 527 I. Kings xxi.